Estrategias metacognitivas y aprendizaje autorregulado en estudiantes de nivel secundaria: Revisión bibliográfica 2019-2023
Fecha
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Acceso al texto completo solo para la Comunidad PUCP
Resumen
El presente trabajo de investigación analiza la interacción entre las estrategias
metacognitivas (EM) y el aprendizaje autorregulado (AA) en estudiantes de nivel
secundaria, basándose en una revisión bibliográfica de estudios publicados entre
2019 y 2024 en las bases de datos Scopus, Dialnet y Springer Links. El objetivo
principal es sintetizar la evidencia empírica y teórica que conecta ambas variables en
su incidencia por un aprendizaje autorregulado. La metodología se centra en
identificar, seleccionar y analizar artículos relevantes, los cuales se agruparon en
cuatro categorías: referidas a las materias escolares, a aspectos afectivos, al profesor
y al uso digital. Se encontró que las EM y el AA establecen una relación recíproca y
bidireccional, destacando las EM como dinamizadoras de los procesos cognitivos y
afectivos en el AA. Entre las EM aplicadas en el nivel secundaria destacan las de
planificación (metacognición declarativa, instrucción explícita), monitoreo (uso de
preguntas, apoyo con andamiaje, modelado instruccional) y evaluación del
aprendizaje (retroalimentación metacognitiva, regulación compartida). Además, se ha
demostrado que las herramientas digitales y entornos virtuales son más eficaces con
EM. Por último, como desafíos para la investigación tenemos: la articulación de EM,
cognitivas y afectivas para lograr el AA, secuenciar la enseñanza de las EM a los
docentes en formación y cómo deben enseñarlas, así como, la transferencia y
evaluación de las EM. Aunque hay avances significativos en este campo, se requiere
delimitar los conceptos, ya que al traslaparse se produce confusión para interpretar
los resultados.
The present research paper analyzes the interaction between metacognitive strategies (MS) and self-regulated learning (SRL) in high school students, based on a literature review of studies published between 2019 and 2024 in Scopus, Dialnet and Springer Links databases. The main objective is to synthesize the empirical and theoretical evidence that connects both variables in their incidence for self-regulated learning. The methodology focuses on identifying, selecting and analyzing relevant articles, which were grouped into four categories: school subjects, affective aspects, teacher and digital use. It was found that the MS and OA establish a reciprocal and bidirectional relationship, highlighting the MS as dynamizers of cognitive and affective processes in OA. Among the MAs applied at the secondary level, those of planning (declarative metacognition, explicit instruction), monitoring (use of questions, support with scaffolding, instructional modeling) and learning assessment (metacognitive feedback, shared regulation) stand out. In addition, digital tools and virtual environments have been shown to be more effective with MS. Finally, as challenges for research we have: the articulation of MS, cognitive and affective to achieve AA, sequencing the teaching of MS to teachers in training and how they should teach them, as well as, the transfer and evaluation of MS. Although there are significant advances in this field, it is necessary to delimit the concepts, since the overlapping of these concepts leads to confusion in interpreting the results.
The present research paper analyzes the interaction between metacognitive strategies (MS) and self-regulated learning (SRL) in high school students, based on a literature review of studies published between 2019 and 2024 in Scopus, Dialnet and Springer Links databases. The main objective is to synthesize the empirical and theoretical evidence that connects both variables in their incidence for self-regulated learning. The methodology focuses on identifying, selecting and analyzing relevant articles, which were grouped into four categories: school subjects, affective aspects, teacher and digital use. It was found that the MS and OA establish a reciprocal and bidirectional relationship, highlighting the MS as dynamizers of cognitive and affective processes in OA. Among the MAs applied at the secondary level, those of planning (declarative metacognition, explicit instruction), monitoring (use of questions, support with scaffolding, instructional modeling) and learning assessment (metacognitive feedback, shared regulation) stand out. In addition, digital tools and virtual environments have been shown to be more effective with MS. Finally, as challenges for research we have: the articulation of MS, cognitive and affective to achieve AA, sequencing the teaching of MS to teachers in training and how they should teach them, as well as, the transfer and evaluation of MS. Although there are significant advances in this field, it is necessary to delimit the concepts, since the overlapping of these concepts leads to confusion in interpreting the results.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Estrategias de aprendizaje, Metaconocimiento--Educación--Bibliografía, Autoeducación--Bibliografía, Educación secundaria
Citación
item.page.endorsement
item.page.review
item.page.supplemented
item.page.referenced
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess