Nivel de conocimiento acerca de la dislexia en los docentes de una institución educativa privada del distrito de Comas
Fecha
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Acceso al texto completo solo para la Comunidad PUCP
Resumen
La presente investigación tuvo como objetivo general identificar el nivel de conocimiento acerca
de la dislexia en docentes de una institución educativa privada del distrito de Comas. La
investigación fue de tipo descriptivo con diseño observacional transversal, se empleó la escala de
conocimientos y creencias sobre la dislexia del desarrollo (KBDDS) de Soriano-Ferrer y
Echegaray-Bengoa (2014). El análisis de confiabilidad con el alfa de Cronbach obtuvo un
coeficiente alfa de 0,80, lo cual indicó un alto índice de fiabilidad tal como lo detalla Rosario
(2020). La muestra estuvo conformada por 41 docentes de una institución educativa de Comas.
Los resultados evidenciaron que los docentes poseen un “conocimiento regular” sobre la dislexia,
lo que evidencia la carencia de información respecto a un tema presente en las aulas. Así mismo,
se identificó el nivel de conocimiento de cada dimensión: información general, causas y síntomas
y tratamiento, en donde los niveles fueron de “poco conocimiento” para la primera dimensión y
“conocimiento regular” para las siguientes dos dimensiones. De igual forma, se evidenciaron
diferencias significativas en cuanto a factores sociodemográficos como edad, tipo de información
recibida sobre dislexia y años de experiencia. Es importante mencionar que dentro de la
información recibida destacan los cursos de formación continua para el conocimiento de la
dislexia. Finalmente, no se hallaron diferencias significativas en factores como nivel de
enseñanza, último grado académico obtenido y especialidad de profesión.
The objective of this research was to identify the level of knowledge about dyslexia among teachers at a private educational institution in the Comas district. The study was descriptive in nature, with a cross-sectional observational design. The Knowledge and Beliefs about Developmental Dyslexia Scale (KBDDS) by Soriano-Ferrer and Echegaray-Bengoa (2014) was used. The reliability analysis using Cronbach's alpha yielded a coefficient of 0.80, indicating a high level of reliability, as noted by Rosario (2020). The sample consisted of 41 teachers from an educational institution in Comas. The results showed that the teachers had a "moderate level of knowledge" about dyslexia, highlighting a lack of information on a topic that is present in classrooms. Furthermore, the level of knowledge in each dimension—general information, causes and symptoms, and treatment— was identified, with the first dimension showing a "low level of knowledge" and the other two showing a "moderate level of knowledge." Significant differences were also found in relation to sociodemographic factors such as age, type of information received about dyslexia, and years of teaching experience. It is important to note that continuing education courses were the most prominent source of information on dyslexia. Lastly, no significant differences were found in factors such as teaching level, highest academic degree obtained, and professional specialization.
The objective of this research was to identify the level of knowledge about dyslexia among teachers at a private educational institution in the Comas district. The study was descriptive in nature, with a cross-sectional observational design. The Knowledge and Beliefs about Developmental Dyslexia Scale (KBDDS) by Soriano-Ferrer and Echegaray-Bengoa (2014) was used. The reliability analysis using Cronbach's alpha yielded a coefficient of 0.80, indicating a high level of reliability, as noted by Rosario (2020). The sample consisted of 41 teachers from an educational institution in Comas. The results showed that the teachers had a "moderate level of knowledge" about dyslexia, highlighting a lack of information on a topic that is present in classrooms. Furthermore, the level of knowledge in each dimension—general information, causes and symptoms, and treatment— was identified, with the first dimension showing a "low level of knowledge" and the other two showing a "moderate level of knowledge." Significant differences were also found in relation to sociodemographic factors such as age, type of information received about dyslexia, and years of teaching experience. It is important to note that continuing education courses were the most prominent source of information on dyslexia. Lastly, no significant differences were found in factors such as teaching level, highest academic degree obtained, and professional specialization.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Dislexia, Trastornos del aprendizaje, Educación inclusiva--Investigaciones, Innovaciones educativas--Perú--Comas (Lima : Distrito), Personal docente--Capacitación--Perú--Comas (Lima : Distrito)
Citación
item.page.endorsement
item.page.review
item.page.supplemented
item.page.referenced
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
