Comunicación grupal en pandemia: Co-construcción discursiva en equipos de diseño gráfico (PUCP). Análisis del curso Comunicación Corporativa 1 durante la COVID-19
Fecha
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Acceso al texto completo solo para la Comunidad PUCP
Resumen
La presente tesis de investigación tuvo como objetivo general analizar las
dinámicas de interacción comunicativa que configuraron la co-construcción discursiva
de proyectos en equipos de estudiantes de Diseño Gráfico de la PUCP durante el
periodo de enseñanza remota de emergencia por la pandemia de COVID-19. El
estudio buscó comprender la profunda transformación de la dinámica proyectual al
migrar de un entorno físico presencial a uno completamente mediado por tecnología.
El método empleado fue de naturaleza cualitativa e interpretativa, adoptando
un diseño de Estudio de Caso Único centrado en el curso "Comunicación Corporativa
1". Se priorizó la profundidad del análisis sobre la generalización estadística,
utilizando un marco teórico basado en la teoría de la Comunicación Constitutiva de
las Organizaciones (CCO) y el concepto de Sensemaking de Weick. Las técnicas de
recolección de datos incluyeron entrevistas en profundidad, grupos focales , así como
el registro documental audiovisual (Zoom) y la observación digital complementaria
(WhatsApp).
Las principales conclusiones indican que la ausencia de soportes físicos
compartidos hizo que el discurso oral se convirtiera en la "materialidad" del diseño,
forzando a los estudiantes a verbalizar procesos creativos intuitivos para la validación
de sus ideas. Se determinó que la "fatiga de Zoom" actuó como un limitante
significativo en la fase de conceptualización creativa. No obstante, el capital social de
unión (bonding) resultó ser un factor determinante para la gestión de conflictos y la
resiliencia grupal. En última instancia, la comunicación constituyó el mecanismo
principal del proceso de diseño, redefiniendo las competencias requeridas para la
práctica profesional en la virtualidad. Se concluye que el proceso colaborativo remoto
exige mecanismos explícitos de sensemaking para reducir la ambigüedad
comunicacional.
The general objective of this research thesis was to analyze the dynamics of communicative interaction that shaped the discursive co-construction of projects in Graphic Design student teams at the PUCP during the emergency remote teaching period due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The study sought to understand the profound transformation of project dynamics when shifting from a physical, face-to-face environment to a completely technology-mediated one. The methodology employed was qualitative and interpretive, adopting a Single Case Study design focused on the "Comunicación Corporativa 1" course. The priority was the depth of the analysis over statistical generalization. Data collection techniques included in-depth interviews, focus groups , as well as audiovisual documentary records (Zoom) and complementary digital observation (WhatsApp). The analytical framework was based on the Communicative Constitution of Organizations (CCO) theory and Weick's sensemaking concept, which was key to understanding how students made sense of the uncertainty. The main conclusions indicate that the absence of shared physical supports caused oral discourse to become the "materiality" of design, forcing students to verbalize intuitive creative processes for the validation of their ideas. It was determined that "Zoom fatigue" acted as a significant limiting factor in the creative conceptualization phase. Nevertheless, bonding social capital proved to be a decisive factor for conflict management and group resilience. Ultimately, communication constituted the primary mechanism of the design process, redefining the competencies required for professional practice in virtuality. It is concluded that the remote collaborative process demands explicit sensemaking mechanisms to reduce the communicational ambiguity inherent to the absence of non-verbal cues.
The general objective of this research thesis was to analyze the dynamics of communicative interaction that shaped the discursive co-construction of projects in Graphic Design student teams at the PUCP during the emergency remote teaching period due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The study sought to understand the profound transformation of project dynamics when shifting from a physical, face-to-face environment to a completely technology-mediated one. The methodology employed was qualitative and interpretive, adopting a Single Case Study design focused on the "Comunicación Corporativa 1" course. The priority was the depth of the analysis over statistical generalization. Data collection techniques included in-depth interviews, focus groups , as well as audiovisual documentary records (Zoom) and complementary digital observation (WhatsApp). The analytical framework was based on the Communicative Constitution of Organizations (CCO) theory and Weick's sensemaking concept, which was key to understanding how students made sense of the uncertainty. The main conclusions indicate that the absence of shared physical supports caused oral discourse to become the "materiality" of design, forcing students to verbalize intuitive creative processes for the validation of their ideas. It was determined that "Zoom fatigue" acted as a significant limiting factor in the creative conceptualization phase. Nevertheless, bonding social capital proved to be a decisive factor for conflict management and group resilience. Ultimately, communication constituted the primary mechanism of the design process, redefining the competencies required for professional practice in virtuality. It is concluded that the remote collaborative process demands explicit sensemaking mechanisms to reduce the communicational ambiguity inherent to the absence of non-verbal cues.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Comunicación organizacional, Trabajo en equipo, Pandemia de COVID-19, 2020---Aspectos educativos, Diseño gráfico--Estudio y enseñanza--Siglo XXI
Citación
Colecciones
item.page.endorsement
item.page.review
item.page.supplemented
item.page.referenced
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
