Medidas de Seguridad ante operaciones no reconocidas ¿Son efectivas?
Fecha
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Acceso al texto completo solo para la Comunidad PUCP
Resumen
Las medidas de seguridad reguladas en nuestro ordenamiento jurídico no
resultan eficientes ante los nuevos mecanismos de operaciones fraudulentas en
la banca móvil, digital. Los distintos criterios que ha venido interpretando
INDECOPI no resulta suficiente para generar seguridad jurídica tanto a los
consumidores como a las entidades financieras para poder aplicarlos en sus
sistemas de seguridad incluyendo el monitoreo de operaciones para poder
identificar el patrón de consumo habitual de los usuarios.
En ese sentido, las medidas de seguridad han venido implementándose acorde
a criterio de cada banco cumpliendo con lo establecido en la normativa peruana
y además siguiendo los lineamientos de INDECOPI. Sin embargo, esto no
parece ser suficiente para evitar el incremento de operaciones fraudulentas vía
banca digitales y transacciones virtuales.
El presente artículo se enfoca en poder buscar un mecanismo para implementar
a nuestro ordenamiento y en adoptar un criterio adicional que se ha venido
implementando en otros países que puede resultar efectivo en nuestro país.
The security measures regulated under our legal system are not effective against the new mechanisms used to carry out fraudulent operations in mobile and digital banking. The various criteria developed by INDECOPI have not been sufficient to provide legal certainty for either consumers or financial institutions, particularly regarding their application within security systems, including transaction monitoring to identify users’ usual consumption patterns. In this context, security measures have been implemented according to each bank’s own criteria, in compliance with Peruvian regulations and following INDECOPI’s guidelines. However, this does not appear to be enough to prevent the rise of fraudulent operations conducted through digital banking and virtual transactions. This article focuses on identifying a mechanism that could be incorporated into our legal system and on adopting an additional criterion that has been implemented in other countries, which may prove effective in Peru.
The security measures regulated under our legal system are not effective against the new mechanisms used to carry out fraudulent operations in mobile and digital banking. The various criteria developed by INDECOPI have not been sufficient to provide legal certainty for either consumers or financial institutions, particularly regarding their application within security systems, including transaction monitoring to identify users’ usual consumption patterns. In this context, security measures have been implemented according to each bank’s own criteria, in compliance with Peruvian regulations and following INDECOPI’s guidelines. However, this does not appear to be enough to prevent the rise of fraudulent operations conducted through digital banking and virtual transactions. This article focuses on identifying a mechanism that could be incorporated into our legal system and on adopting an additional criterion that has been implemented in other countries, which may prove effective in Peru.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Protección del consumidor--Legislación--Perú, Fraude--Perú, Delitos informaticos--Legislación--Perú
Citación
Colecciones
item.page.endorsement
item.page.review
item.page.supplemented
item.page.referenced
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cf
