Informe jurídico sobre la resolución N° 4680- 2023-SUNARP-TR
Fecha
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Acceso al texto completo solo para la Comunidad PUCP
Resumen
La presente investigación tiene como eje el análisis de la caducidad de las
hipotecas que garantizan obligaciones futuras o eventuales, en el marco del
Reglamento de Predios. A partir del estudio de la Resolución N.° 4680-2023-
SUNARP-TR, se examina el criterio adoptado por el Tribunal Registral respecto
al inicio del cómputo del plazo de caducidad en este tipo de garantías.
El problema central radica en que el Tribunal considera que, al no haberse
acreditado el nacimiento de la obligación en el Registro, debe asumirse que esta
nunca existió, lo cual es un criterio peligroso que termina perjudicando a los
acreedores. Esta interpretación plantea interrogantes sobre los límites de la
función calificadora y sobre la posibilidad de que el Tribunal exceda sus
competencias normativas al apartarse del texto reglamentario.
Este trabajo busca evaluar la validez de dicho criterio, analizar sus implicancias
jurídicas y determinar si respeta la normativa vigente. Para ello, se utilizarán
fuentes normativas, doctrinarias y resoluciones administrativas pertinentes.
This research focuses on the analysis of the expiration of mortgages that guarantee future or eventual obligations, within the framework of the Real Estate Regulation. Based on the study of Resolution No. 4680-2023-SUNARP-TR, the criterion adopted by the Registry Court regarding the beginning of the computation of the expiration period in this type of guarantees is examined. The central problem lies in the fact that the Court considers that, since the birth of the obligation has not been accredited in the Registry, it must be assumed that the obligation never existed, which is a dangerous criterion that ends up prejudicing the creditors. This interpretation raises questions about the limits of the qualification function and about the possibility that the Court exceeds its regulatory powers by deviating from the regulatory text. This paper seeks to assess the validity of this criterion, to analyze its legal implications and to determine whether it complies with the regulations in force. For this purpose, relevant normative and doctrinal sources and administrative resolutions will be used.
This research focuses on the analysis of the expiration of mortgages that guarantee future or eventual obligations, within the framework of the Real Estate Regulation. Based on the study of Resolution No. 4680-2023-SUNARP-TR, the criterion adopted by the Registry Court regarding the beginning of the computation of the expiration period in this type of guarantees is examined. The central problem lies in the fact that the Court considers that, since the birth of the obligation has not been accredited in the Registry, it must be assumed that the obligation never existed, which is a dangerous criterion that ends up prejudicing the creditors. This interpretation raises questions about the limits of the qualification function and about the possibility that the Court exceeds its regulatory powers by deviating from the regulatory text. This paper seeks to assess the validity of this criterion, to analyze its legal implications and to determine whether it complies with the regulations in force. For this purpose, relevant normative and doctrinal sources and administrative resolutions will be used.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Derecho registral--Jurisprudencia--Perú, Hipotecas--Jurisprudencia--Perú, Derechos reales--Jurisprudencia--Perú, Caducidad (Derecho)--Perú, Gravámenes (Derecho)--Perú