Informe Jurídico sobre la Sentencia 197/2023 del Exp. N.° 00238-2021-PA/TC (Caso AOE)
Date
2024-08-07
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Acceso al texto completo solo para la Comunidad PUCP
Abstract
El presente informe jurídico analiza la Sentencia del Expediente N.° 238-2021-
PA/TC. Para ello, se basa en la siguiente pregunta principal: ¿La medida de
prohibir la distribución gratuita del AOE por parte del MINSA implica una
vulneración de los derechos a la autodeterminación reproductiva (DAR) y a la
igualdad de las personas con capacidad de gestar (PCG)? Para responder la
misma, se ha utilizado legislación nacional, así como tratados internacionales.
Asimismo, en relación a la jurisprudencia se contó con las sentencias de los
Expedientes N° 7435-2006-PC/TC, N° 2005-2009-AA/TC y N° 3378-2019-PA/TC
del TC, así como la sentencia del caso Manuela y otros vs. El Salvador y la
sentencia del caso I.V. vs. Bolivia de la Corte IDH. Finalmente, tras el análisis
correspondiente, se concluye que la prohibición de distribuir gratuitamente el
AOE implica una violación del DAR y a la igualdad y no discriminación, afectando
desproporcionadamente a PCG de bajos recursos económicos.
This legal report analyzes Judgment 197/2023 of Case No. 238-2021-PA/TC. It is based on the following primary question: Does the Ministry of Health's prohibition on the free distribution of emergency oral contraceptives imply a violation of the rights to reproductive self-determination and to equality of persons with the capacity to gestate? The analysis uses national legislation and international treaties. Additionally, jurisprudence was considered, including the rulings of Cases No. 7435-2006-PC/TC, No. 2005-2009-AA/TC, and No. 03378- 2019-PA/TC, as well as the ruling in the case of Manuela and Others vs. El Salvador and the ruling in the caso of I.V. vs. Bolivia of the I/A Court H.R. Finally, after the corresponding analysis, it is concluded that the prohibition on the free distribution of emergency oral contraceptives constitutes a violation of the right to reproductive self-determination and to equality, disproportionately affecting economically disadvantaged persons with the capacity to gestate.
This legal report analyzes Judgment 197/2023 of Case No. 238-2021-PA/TC. It is based on the following primary question: Does the Ministry of Health's prohibition on the free distribution of emergency oral contraceptives imply a violation of the rights to reproductive self-determination and to equality of persons with the capacity to gestate? The analysis uses national legislation and international treaties. Additionally, jurisprudence was considered, including the rulings of Cases No. 7435-2006-PC/TC, No. 2005-2009-AA/TC, and No. 03378- 2019-PA/TC, as well as the ruling in the case of Manuela and Others vs. El Salvador and the ruling in the caso of I.V. vs. Bolivia of the I/A Court H.R. Finally, after the corresponding analysis, it is concluded that the prohibition on the free distribution of emergency oral contraceptives constitutes a violation of the right to reproductive self-determination and to equality, disproportionately affecting economically disadvantaged persons with the capacity to gestate.
Description
Keywords
Anticonceptivos--Aspectos legales--Perú, Discriminación sexual--Perú, Derechos sexuales--Perú, Tribunales constitucionales--Jurisprudencia--Perú
Citation
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess