Informe Jurídico sobre la Resolución de Tribunal Fiscal No.10923-8-2011: Aplicación del régimen de neutralidad tributaria a las escisiones con bloques patrimoniales neutros o negativos
No Thumbnail Available
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Abstract
El presente análisis aborda la Resolución de Tribunal Fiscal No.10923-8-2011, en la cual
se cuestiona la validez de dos escisiones parciales realizadas por Promotora Intercorp
S.A., con bloques patrimoniales de valor neutro, en vista de la aplicación del régimen de
neutralidad tributaria previsto en la legislación peruana.
El problema principal radica en determinar si en virtud de la aplicación de la Norma VIII
del Código Tributario se puede limitar la neutralidad tributaria exclusivamente a
escisiones con bloques patrimoniales positivos.
El análisis recurre a instrumentos normativos clave, como la Ley General de Sociedades,
el Código Tributario, la Ley del Impuesto a la Renta y la Ley del Impuesto General a las
Ventas. Asimismo, se consideran jurisprudencias relevantes y doctrina nacional e
internacional, enfatizando criterios como la sustancia económica y la continuidad del
negocio.
Se concluye que las escisiones con bloques patrimoniales neutros o negativos son
reconocidas por la normativa societaria peruana y, por ende, son válidas. Por ese motivo,
y en tanto cuenten con sustancia económica, corresponde aplicar el régimen de
neutralidad tributario.
The present analysis examines Tax Court Resolution No. 10923-8-2011, which challenges the validity of two partial demergers executed by Promotora Intercorp S.A., involving asset blocks with neutral value, under the framework of the tax neutrality regime provided by Peruvian law. The principal legal issue concerns whether, pursuant to the application of Article VIII of the Tax Code, the tax neutrality regime may be restricted exclusively to demergers transferring asset blocks with positive net value. This analysis draws upon critical legal instruments, including the General Companies Law, the Tax Code, the Income Tax Law, and the General Sales Tax Law. Additionally, it considers pertinent case law and national and international legal doctrine, with particular emphasis on principles such as economic substance and the continuity of business operations. It is concluded that demergers involving neutral or negative asset blocks are expressly recognized as valid under Peruvian corporate law. Accordingly, provided such transactions demonstrate economic substance, they are entitled to the application of the tax neutrality regime.
The present analysis examines Tax Court Resolution No. 10923-8-2011, which challenges the validity of two partial demergers executed by Promotora Intercorp S.A., involving asset blocks with neutral value, under the framework of the tax neutrality regime provided by Peruvian law. The principal legal issue concerns whether, pursuant to the application of Article VIII of the Tax Code, the tax neutrality regime may be restricted exclusively to demergers transferring asset blocks with positive net value. This analysis draws upon critical legal instruments, including the General Companies Law, the Tax Code, the Income Tax Law, and the General Sales Tax Law. Additionally, it considers pertinent case law and national and international legal doctrine, with particular emphasis on principles such as economic substance and the continuity of business operations. It is concluded that demergers involving neutral or negative asset blocks are expressly recognized as valid under Peruvian corporate law. Accordingly, provided such transactions demonstrate economic substance, they are entitled to the application of the tax neutrality regime.
Description
Keywords
Derecho tributario--Jurisprudencia--Perú, Derecho tributario--Legislación--Perú, Impuesto a la renta--Legislación--Perú, Impuesto general a las ventas--Legislación--Perú