Bullying y migración venezolana: estudio mixto CUAN-cual en colegios estatales de Lima Metropolitana
Date
2023-08-28
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Abstract
El presente estudio explora las diferencias en el riesgo de ser víctima de buylling entre
estudiantes migrantes venezolanos con desplazamiento forzado y colegios estatales.
empleó un diseño mixto CUAN-cual con estatus dominante y secuencial (Hernández,
2010). Participaron un total de 246 escolares de secundaria entre 12 a 17 años (M=14.73,
DE=1.41), 123 peruanos y 123 venezolanos. Se empleó la Escala de Agresión y
Victimización (Kilimajer, 2018), un cuestionario para los datos sociodemográfico y la
experiencia con la migración, y un Diario de Campo. Los resultados muestran las
dificultades del instrumento para discriminar el riesgo de ser víctimas de bullying con
condición de desplazamiento forzado. A nivel cualitativo se encontró que ambos grupos
naturalizan el empleo de la violencia, identificándose diferencias en la manera de
legitimar el uso de la violencia. Se concluye que las pruebas diseñadas para el presente
estudio no son sensibles en detectarlas en situaciones de discriminación y se deben
priorizar diseños CUALl-cuan para el estudio de este tipo de fenómeno.
The aim of this study was to analyze the differences of the risk of being victims of bullying between Venezuelan students who had suffered forced displacement and Peruvian students from public high schools. For this, a QUANTITIVE-qualitative mixed method with dominant and sequential status was used (Hernandez, 2010). 246 high school students between 12 and 17 years participated (M=14.73, SD=1.41), 123 peruvians and 123 venezuelans. The Aggression and Victimization Scale (Kilimajer, 2018), a sociodemographic questionnarie and a Field Diary were used. As a result, no quantitive differences were found in the risk of being victims of bullying with the condition of forced displacement. It is concluded that the test designed for this study was not sensitive in detecting situations of discrimination and qualitative-quantitive designs should be prioritized for greater accuracy.
The aim of this study was to analyze the differences of the risk of being victims of bullying between Venezuelan students who had suffered forced displacement and Peruvian students from public high schools. For this, a QUANTITIVE-qualitative mixed method with dominant and sequential status was used (Hernandez, 2010). 246 high school students between 12 and 17 years participated (M=14.73, SD=1.41), 123 peruvians and 123 venezuelans. The Aggression and Victimization Scale (Kilimajer, 2018), a sociodemographic questionnarie and a Field Diary were used. As a result, no quantitive differences were found in the risk of being victims of bullying with the condition of forced displacement. It is concluded that the test designed for this study was not sensitive in detecting situations of discrimination and qualitative-quantitive designs should be prioritized for greater accuracy.
Description
Keywords
Acoso escolar, Violencia en la escuela, Venezolanos en Perú, Escolares--Perú--Lima
Citation
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess