Informe jurídico sobre la casación No. 3917-2018
Fecha
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Acceso al texto completo solo para la Comunidad PUCP
Resumen
El presente informe jurídico analiza la Casación No. 3917-2018, mediante la cual
la Corte Suprema dispuso que para el cuestionamiento de un acuerdo de Junta
General que disponga la exclusión de accionistas, corresponde interponer una
pretensión de impugnación de acuerdos societarios y no una pretensión de
nulidad.
En ese sentido, el análisis de este recurso de casación parte por definir en qué
consiste la figura de la exclusión de accionistas, en qué supuestos se permite su
implementación y cómo se aplica esta figura en la legislación comparada.
Asimismo, se analiza si la Ley General de Sociedades regula la exclusión de
accionistas para todo tipo de sociedades.
Ello para poder determinar si la Corte Suprema analizó de manera correcta la
forma en la que se dispuso la exclusión de accionistas adoptada en la Junta
General de la Minera Otapara, así como determinar si se cumplieron los
requisitos exigidos por la Ley General de Sociedades para su aplicación.
Para dichos efectos, el análisis emplea instrumentos normativos tales como la
Ley General de Sociedades y la legislación comparada. Asimismo, se realiza la
revisión de jurisprudencia relevante, así como doctrina nacional e internacional,
con énfasis en la aplicación de la figura de exclusión de accionistas.
This legal report analyzes Cassation No. 3917-2018, whereby the Supreme Court ruled that in order to challenge a General Meeting agreement providing for the exclusion of shareholders, a claim for the annulment of corporate agreements must be filed, rather than a claim for nullity. In this regard, the analysis of this cassation appeal begins by defining what shareholder exclusion consists of, in what circumstances its implementation is permitted, and how this concept is applied in comparative law. It also analyzes whether the General Companies Law regulates shareholder exclusion for all types of companies. This is in order to determine whether the Supreme Court correctly analyzed the manner in which the exclusion of shareholders was decided at the General Meeting of Minera Otapara, as well as to determine whether the requirements of the General Companies Law for its application were met. For these purposes, the analysis uses regulatory instruments such as the General Companies Act and comparative legislation. It also reviews relevant case law, as well as national and international doctrine, with an emphasis on the application of shareholder exclusion.
This legal report analyzes Cassation No. 3917-2018, whereby the Supreme Court ruled that in order to challenge a General Meeting agreement providing for the exclusion of shareholders, a claim for the annulment of corporate agreements must be filed, rather than a claim for nullity. In this regard, the analysis of this cassation appeal begins by defining what shareholder exclusion consists of, in what circumstances its implementation is permitted, and how this concept is applied in comparative law. It also analyzes whether the General Companies Law regulates shareholder exclusion for all types of companies. This is in order to determine whether the Supreme Court correctly analyzed the manner in which the exclusion of shareholders was decided at the General Meeting of Minera Otapara, as well as to determine whether the requirements of the General Companies Law for its application were met. For these purposes, the analysis uses regulatory instruments such as the General Companies Act and comparative legislation. It also reviews relevant case law, as well as national and international doctrine, with an emphasis on the application of shareholder exclusion.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Derecho societario--Jurisprudencia--Perú, Accionistas, Sociedades comerciales
Citación
Colecciones
item.page.endorsement
item.page.review
item.page.supplemented
item.page.referenced
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
