El Presupuesto Participativo como mecanismo de respuesta a las demandas de desarrollo local en la Municipalidad Provincial de San Román - Juliaca
Date
2022-09-21
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Abstract
El año 2003 se dio la ley marco del Presupuesto Participativo, Ley N° 28056,
allí se plantea que se dé la posibilidad de participación a la sociedad civil
pueda participar en el uso proporcional, democrático y equitativo de los
recursos y el desarrollo de la comunidad, siendo parte en las decisiones con
los gobiernos locales, dándosele un estatus de cogestor. Ya ha pasado 10
años desde la vigencia de esta ley y es importante conocer cómo ha
contribuido al desarrollo local, ya que hay voces que la valoran positivamente
y otras que la ven sólo como un cumplimiento formal y que no se traduce en
el desarrollo. Esta investigación tiene como objetivo principal objetivo explicar
en qué medida el presupuesto participativo es un mecanismo que responde a
las demandas de desarrollo local en la Municipalidad Provincial de San
Román-Juliaca 2011-2014. Es una investigación de enfoque cualitativo de
nivel exploratorio, tipo básico, diseño no experimental y corte trasnversal. La
información se extrajo de fuente primaria, con la técnica de la entrevista y el
análisis documental y los instrumentos Ficha de entrevista semi estructurada
para ciudadanos y funcionarios de la municipalidad provincial. La muestra
estuvo conformada por 08 sujetos, de los cuales 03 eran funcionarios de la
municipalidad y 5 ciudadanos representantes de asociaciones y
organizaciones. Se llegó a los siguientes resultados: la capacitación o
preparación para el presupuesto participativo tuvo poca asistencia debido a
que algunos no lo consideran importante. En la concertación se presentó
proyectos sin vinculación con los ejes estratégicos de la municipalidad
provincial o carentes de las condiciones básicas para su priorización,
financiamiento y ejecución, estas razones y las limitaciones presupuestales
influyeron en que sólo se ejecutara el 10% del total de los proyectos. A pesar
de todas estas limitaciones se logró generar infraestructuras, programas, bien
común y diversos tipos de servicios. En base a estos beneficios se cree que
el presupuesto participativo responde en gran medida a las demandas de
desarrollo humano, social, económico, ambiental y de gestión institucional. Sin
embargo, se aclara que es necesario aceptar proyectos de inversión
distribuidos equitativamente por sectores, con criterios claramente explicados
RESUMEN
5
para evitar sentimientos de desengaño en los participantes. Asimismo, es
importante hacer buen uso de los recursos en proyectos duraderos, de
impacto significativo, que afronten los problemas medulares de la ciudad y
que vayan acordes con los ejes transversales de la Municipalidad Provincial
de San Román.
In 2003, the framework law of the Participatory Budget was passed, Law No. 28056, there it is proposed that the possibility of participation be given to civil society to participate in the proportional, democratic and equitable use of resources and the development of the community , being part of the decisions with local governments, giving it a comanager status. It has already been 10 years since this law came into force and it is important to know how it has contributed to local development, since there are voices that value it positively and others that see it only as formal compliance and that it does not translate into development. The main objective of this research is to explain to what extent the participatory budget is a mechanism that responds to the demands of local development in the Provincial Municipality of San Román-Juliaca 2011-2014. It is a research with a qualitative approach of exploratory level, basic type, non-experimental design and cross section. The information was extracted from a primary source, with the interview technique and documentary analysis and the instruments of a semi-structured interview file for citizens and officials of the provincial municipality. The sample consisted of 08 subjects, of which 03 were municipal officials and 5 citizens representing associations and organizations. The following results were reached: the training or preparation for the participatory budget had little attendance because some do not consider it important. In the agreement, projects were presented without connection with the strategic axes of the provincial municipality or lacking the basic conditions for their prioritization, financing and execution, these reasons and the budgetary limitations influenced that only 10% of the total projects were executed. . Despite all these limitations, it was possible to generate infrastructures, programs, the common good and various types of services. Based on these benefits, it is believed that the participatory budget largely responds to the demands of human, social, economic, environmental development and institutional management. However, it is clarified that 7 it is necessary to accept investment projects evenly distributed by sectors, with clearly explained criteria to avoid feelings of disappointment in the participants. Likewise, it is important to make good use of resources in long-lasting projects, with a significant impact, that address the core problems of the city and that are consistent with the transversal axes of the Provincial Municipality of San Román.
In 2003, the framework law of the Participatory Budget was passed, Law No. 28056, there it is proposed that the possibility of participation be given to civil society to participate in the proportional, democratic and equitable use of resources and the development of the community , being part of the decisions with local governments, giving it a comanager status. It has already been 10 years since this law came into force and it is important to know how it has contributed to local development, since there are voices that value it positively and others that see it only as formal compliance and that it does not translate into development. The main objective of this research is to explain to what extent the participatory budget is a mechanism that responds to the demands of local development in the Provincial Municipality of San Román-Juliaca 2011-2014. It is a research with a qualitative approach of exploratory level, basic type, non-experimental design and cross section. The information was extracted from a primary source, with the interview technique and documentary analysis and the instruments of a semi-structured interview file for citizens and officials of the provincial municipality. The sample consisted of 08 subjects, of which 03 were municipal officials and 5 citizens representing associations and organizations. The following results were reached: the training or preparation for the participatory budget had little attendance because some do not consider it important. In the agreement, projects were presented without connection with the strategic axes of the provincial municipality or lacking the basic conditions for their prioritization, financing and execution, these reasons and the budgetary limitations influenced that only 10% of the total projects were executed. . Despite all these limitations, it was possible to generate infrastructures, programs, the common good and various types of services. Based on these benefits, it is believed that the participatory budget largely responds to the demands of human, social, economic, environmental development and institutional management. However, it is clarified that 7 it is necessary to accept investment projects evenly distributed by sectors, with clearly explained criteria to avoid feelings of disappointment in the participants. Likewise, it is important to make good use of resources in long-lasting projects, with a significant impact, that address the core problems of the city and that are consistent with the transversal axes of the Provincial Municipality of San Román.
Description
Keywords
Presupuesto municipal--Perú--Juliaca (Puno : Provincia), Desarrollo humano, Desarrollo económico