Informe jurídico sobre la Resolución 008-2023/SDC-INDECOPI
Date
2024-08-09
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Acceso al texto completo solo para la Comunidad PUCP
Abstract
El presente informe jurídico se encarga de analizar los criterios tomados por
la Sala Especializada para resolver la controversia entre Olva Courier S.A.C.
y Afe Courier S.A.C. presente en la Resolución 008-2023/SDC- INDECOPI.
Este caso, empieza con la denuncia interpuesta por Olva Courier por la
presunta comisión de actos de competencia desleal en la modalidad de
denigración contra Afe Courier y culmina con la decisión de la Sala
Especializada en Defensa de la Competencia que confirma, en varios puntos,
la Resolución 032-2022/CCD-INDECOPI, de primera instancia. De esta
manera, el tema central del trabajo radica en el análisis de la decisión tomada
por la Sala Especializada en Defensa de la Competencia de considerar que
se configura un acto de denigración basándose, principalmente, en la clara
referencia a la oferta de la empresa competidora. Dicho análisis, también,
desarrolla criterios importantes como la alusión inequívoca, unívoca y la
aplicación de los requisitos de la exceptio veritatis, los cuales serán tomados
en consideración para el desarrollo del presente trabajo. Además, en este
informe se desarrolla la aplicación de los criterios de la exceptio veritatis, la
configuración del acto denigratorio y como este se puede diferenciar de otros
actos de competencia desleal. Finalmente, la última cuestión jurídica que
plantea este informe se refiere al análisis desarrollado por la Sala
Especializada sobre si las afirmaciones: “Olvaidate de las colas nosotros lo
llevamos por ti” y “Olvaidate de procesos en internet” constituyen un acto
competencia por medio de una interpretación integral y superficial del mensaje
publicitario aludido.
This legal report is responsible for analyzing the criteria taken by the Specialized Chamber to resolve the controversy between Olva Courier S.A.C. and Afe Courier S.A.C. present in Resolution 008-2023/SDC- INDECOPI. This case begins with the complaint filed by Olva Courier for the alleged commission of acts of unfair competition in the form of denigration against Afe Courier and culminates with the decision of the Specialized Chamber for the Defense of Competition that confirms, in several points, the Resolution 032- 2022/CCD-INDECOPI, of first instance. In this way, the central theme of the work lies in the analysis of the decision taken by the Specialized Chamber for the Defense of Competition to consider that an act of denigration is configured based, mainly, on the clear reference to the offer of the competing company. . Said analysis also develops important criteria such as unequivocal, univocal allusion and the application of the requirements of exceptio veritatis, which will be taken into consideration for the development of this work. Furthermore, this report develops the application of the exceptio veritatis criteria, the configuration of the denigrating act and how it can be differentiated from other acts of unfair competition. Finally, the last legal question raised by this report refers to the analysis developed by the Specialized Chamber on whether or not the statements: “Forget about the queues, we will take care of it for you” and “Forget about online processes” constitute or not an act of jurisdiction by means of a comprehensive and superficial interpretation of the aforementioned advertising message.
This legal report is responsible for analyzing the criteria taken by the Specialized Chamber to resolve the controversy between Olva Courier S.A.C. and Afe Courier S.A.C. present in Resolution 008-2023/SDC- INDECOPI. This case begins with the complaint filed by Olva Courier for the alleged commission of acts of unfair competition in the form of denigration against Afe Courier and culminates with the decision of the Specialized Chamber for the Defense of Competition that confirms, in several points, the Resolution 032- 2022/CCD-INDECOPI, of first instance. In this way, the central theme of the work lies in the analysis of the decision taken by the Specialized Chamber for the Defense of Competition to consider that an act of denigration is configured based, mainly, on the clear reference to the offer of the competing company. . Said analysis also develops important criteria such as unequivocal, univocal allusion and the application of the requirements of exceptio veritatis, which will be taken into consideration for the development of this work. Furthermore, this report develops the application of the exceptio veritatis criteria, the configuration of the denigrating act and how it can be differentiated from other acts of unfair competition. Finally, the last legal question raised by this report refers to the analysis developed by the Specialized Chamber on whether or not the statements: “Forget about the queues, we will take care of it for you” and “Forget about online processes” constitute or not an act of jurisdiction by means of a comprehensive and superficial interpretation of the aforementioned advertising message.
Description
Keywords
Protección del consumidor--Jurisprudencia--Perú, Competencia económica desleal--Jurisprudencia--Perú, Responsabilidad contractual--Jurisprudencia--Perú, Derecho administrativo--Jurisprudencia--Perú
Citation
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess