Search
Now showing items 71-80 of 11108
Informe sobre Expediente N° 48004-2007
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2021-07-13)
constitucionalizar el sistema procesal penal. En esa línea, se tiene como objeto determinar si las interpretaciones realizadas por muchos fiscales, jueces penales y Colegiados se condicen con los principios y derechos
reconocidos por la Constitución vigente. Al...
Informe sobre Sentencia de Vista Constitucional N° 054-2019-SCP
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2021-02-24)
El presente informe analiza la Sentencia de Vista Constitucional N° 054-2019-SCP emitida
dentro de un proceso de amparo contra resoluciones judiciales emitidas en el marco de un
proceso ordinario de mejor derecho de propiedad. La elección de esta...
El derecho a la comunicación frente al ejercicio del poder de dirección del empleador para restringir el uso de celulares durante la jornada de trabajo
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2023-04-21)
¿Es constitucionalmente válido prohibir el uso de celulares, siempre que dicho
uso implique un riesgo para la seguridad y salud del trabajador y sus compañeros
de trabajo?
Ampara al trabajador para el uso de celulares, el derecho a la comunicación...
Informe jurídico sobre el Caso Masacre de Santo Domingo vs. Colombia
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2023-08-08)
En el contexto de los enfrentamientos entre el Estado de Colombia y grupos armados no
estatales se produjeron diversas violaciones de Derechos Humanos, como las masacres
a civiles. Es así que en este informe se analiza el Caso Masacre de Santo...
In the context of the confrontations between the State of Colombia and non-state armed groups, various violations of Human Rights took place, such as the massacres of civilians. Thus, this report analyzes the Santo Domingo Massacre Case vs. Colombia, handed down in the judgment of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of November 30, 2012. In this case, the Court concluded that the State of Colombia is responsible for the violation of human rights, to the detriment of civilian adults and children, to cause of a military bombardment carried out on the hamlet of Santo Domingo. However, this report criticizes part of the analysis carried out by the Court and the declaration of lack of State responsibility for the rights to due process and judicial protection, despite the fact that the investigation of the facts took more than four years due to a competition issue. The methodology used in this report consists of the legal analysis of the rights present in the American Convention on Human Rights mainly through the norms of International Humanitarian Law, the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, without prejudice to resorting to other sources of Law....
In the context of the confrontations between the State of Colombia and non-state armed groups, various violations of Human Rights took place, such as the massacres of civilians. Thus, this report analyzes the Santo Domingo Massacre Case vs. Colombia, handed down in the judgment of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of November 30, 2012. In this case, the Court concluded that the State of Colombia is responsible for the violation of human rights, to the detriment of civilian adults and children, to cause of a military bombardment carried out on the hamlet of Santo Domingo. However, this report criticizes part of the analysis carried out by the Court and the declaration of lack of State responsibility for the rights to due process and judicial protection, despite the fact that the investigation of the facts took more than four years due to a competition issue. The methodology used in this report consists of the legal analysis of the rights present in the American Convention on Human Rights mainly through the norms of International Humanitarian Law, the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, without prejudice to resorting to other sources of Law....
La violencia sexual dentro del periodo de violencia del conflicto armado interno en los casos J vs Perú y Gladys Espinoza vs Perú: mujeres detenidas sobrevivientes de tortura sexual, perspectiva de género y violación a los derechos humanos como procesadas por ley especial 25475 (Ley antiterrorista)
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2024-05-09)
hechos jurídicamente
relevantes del caso, así como también los derechos y artículos tipificados en la Convención
Americana de los derechos humanos que fueron violados por el Estado Peruano peruano.
Todo ello por la acusación penal contra ellas en base a...
Limitaciones al derecho de propiedad de Comunidades Campesinas y Nativas en los procesos de formalización de la propiedad en el Perú
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2021-05-06)
simbólico, puesto que las tierras comunales podrían
afectarse en base a una ley o norma de similar rango. Entonces, en el caso de las
Comunidades Campesinas y Nativas ¿Cómo se garantiza su derecho de propiedad
ancestral frente a las limitaciones impuestas...
La reparación por la afectación al derecho a la libertad sindical en el caso de locadores de servicios con vínculo desnaturalizado
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2020-02-28)
El presente artículo parte de un análisis de las fórmulas de reparación civil que han sido empleadas para resarcir la afectación a los derechos laborales individuales, para luego analizar las distintas propuestas de resarcimiento a los derechos...
Informe sobre expediente de relevancia jurídica N°13.002, E-2812, caso Britez Arce y otros vs. Argentina: análisis de la violencia obstétrica a la luz del derecho internacional de los derechos humanos
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2024-06-20)
El presente informe jurídico analiza la Sentencia del Caso Britez Arce Vs. Argentina, resuelta
por la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos en el año 2022, en la cual se evidencia que
el trato deshumanizado e indebido ejercido contra Cristina...
¿Quién tiene el control?: los derechos de las personas LGBTIQ+ en Perú
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2024-05-31)
El presente trabajo aborda la aplicación de los estándares interamericanos de
protección de los derechos de las personas LGBTIQ+ por Perú a través del
control de convencionalidad. En ese sentido, nos centraremos en sus dos
manifestaciones ("erga...
The present paper addresses the application of inter-American standards for the protection of the rights of LGBTIQ+ persons by Peru through conventional control. In this regard, we will focus on its two manifestations ("erga omnes" and "inter partes") based on the analysis of the normative advances and the judgments developed by the Constitutional Court on gender identity and equal marriage; as well as those judgments in which Peru is a material part of the process regarding cases of violence against LGBTIQ+ persons before the Inter- American Court of Human Rights....
The present paper addresses the application of inter-American standards for the protection of the rights of LGBTIQ+ persons by Peru through conventional control. In this regard, we will focus on its two manifestations ("erga omnes" and "inter partes") based on the analysis of the normative advances and the judgments developed by the Constitutional Court on gender identity and equal marriage; as well as those judgments in which Peru is a material part of the process regarding cases of violence against LGBTIQ+ persons before the Inter- American Court of Human Rights....
El derecho fundamental a la propiedad frente a la extinción de dominio
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2021-05-11)
El crimen organizado y las actividades relacionadas a los delitos graves, generan un
patrimonio criminal o de origen ilícito consistentes en bienes muebles e inmuebles, productos,
acciones, empresas, y otros derechos de propiedad, donde la eficacia...
Organized crime and activities related to serious crimes, generate a criminal or unlawful property consisting of movable and immovable property, products, actions, companies, and other property rights, where the effectiveness of criminal law, beyond personal sanction, seizure or confiscation, fails to deprive and affect that criminal heritage or property rights that are intended for illicit activities, leaving a sense of impunity. That is why States are constantly seeking to combat this scourge that causes profound socio-economic damage. An important tool, which seeks to strike and affect the assets of criminal organizations and criminal groups, is the termination of dominance, which is independent of criminal action, does not seek personal sanction; seeks to extinguish property rights of illicit origin or for illicit purposes, without any consideration in favor of the State. However, we propose that its recent implementation and adaptation to Peruvians legal system, since the second half of 2018, could highlight some anti-constitution regulatory provisions such as due process, the presumption of innocence, among others, which could ultimately directly affect the right to property, which have a constitutional basis, while the domain-extinguishing figure does not. Therefore, our goal is to make an analysis of the fundamental right to property, in the face of the process of termination of dominance and to notice some inconsistencies and deficiencies in the experience of Latin American countries such as Colombia and Mexico that have modified their fundamental letters and complemented their maturity through their Supreme Courts, to avoid arbitrariness and ensure the full validity of the fundamental right to property and other fundamental rights within a rule of law and continue with the autonomy of the much-needed domain extinction process in the fight against crime....
Organized crime and activities related to serious crimes, generate a criminal or unlawful property consisting of movable and immovable property, products, actions, companies, and other property rights, where the effectiveness of criminal law, beyond personal sanction, seizure or confiscation, fails to deprive and affect that criminal heritage or property rights that are intended for illicit activities, leaving a sense of impunity. That is why States are constantly seeking to combat this scourge that causes profound socio-economic damage. An important tool, which seeks to strike and affect the assets of criminal organizations and criminal groups, is the termination of dominance, which is independent of criminal action, does not seek personal sanction; seeks to extinguish property rights of illicit origin or for illicit purposes, without any consideration in favor of the State. However, we propose that its recent implementation and adaptation to Peruvians legal system, since the second half of 2018, could highlight some anti-constitution regulatory provisions such as due process, the presumption of innocence, among others, which could ultimately directly affect the right to property, which have a constitutional basis, while the domain-extinguishing figure does not. Therefore, our goal is to make an analysis of the fundamental right to property, in the face of the process of termination of dominance and to notice some inconsistencies and deficiencies in the experience of Latin American countries such as Colombia and Mexico that have modified their fundamental letters and complemented their maturity through their Supreme Courts, to avoid arbitrariness and ensure the full validity of the fundamental right to property and other fundamental rights within a rule of law and continue with the autonomy of the much-needed domain extinction process in the fight against crime....