Modelo de implementación institucional (Enforcement) que determinó la creatividad y eficacia de la campaña de publicidad estatal “El COVID No Mata Solo, No Seamos Cómplices” dirigida a la lucha contra la pandemia del coronavirus en el Perú entre agosto y octubre de 2020
Fecha
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Acceso al texto completo solo para la Comunidad PUCP
Resumen
La investigación analiza el proceso de desarrollo de la campaña de publicidad estatal
“El COVID no mata sólo; no seamos cómplices”, dirigida a la lucha contra la pandemia de la
COVID-19 en el Perú entre agosto y octubre de 2020, como modelo para establecer
referencias de prácticas en comunicación pública que garanticen la creatividad y eficacia de
sus resultados. De esta manera, puede servir de base para diseñar herramientas normativas
que fortalezcan la gobernanza y el enforcement de su aplicación, más aún en contextos de
crisis como el de la pandemia del coronavirus.
Además de realizar un profundo análisis comparado de las definiciones de la
comunicación y la política, repasa los estudios teóricos de las instituciones desde la ciencia
política y las teorías del cambio institucional, tanto a nivel vertical o multinivel como a nivel
horizontal o histórico. De esta manera, concluye no solo que la comunicación y la política
comparten características esenciales, sino que, al determinar los paradigmas de cohesión
social, la comunicación se constituye como el marco institucional más amplio de la estructura
social.
Los hallazgos aquí expuestos cuestionan paradigmas tan extendidos como el concepto
de comunicación política, que integra dos elementos que, en esencia, son lo mismo y que no
pueden existir como materia que supone complementariedad. Asimismo, destacan el
concepto de hegemonía medio-céntrica como un fenómeno que ha limitado el entendimiento
de la esencia política de la comunicación y debilitado el desarrollo epistemológico de la
materia, afectando sus propios mecanismos de gobernanza, condiciones esenciales para
asegurar la cohesión social, propósito esencial de la comunicación, lo que garantiza la
subsistencia de nuestras democracias.
The research analyzes the development process of the state advertising campaign “El COVID no mata sólo; no seamos cómplices” ("COVID does not only kill; let’s not be accomplices”), aimed at fighting the COVID-19 pandemic in Peru between August and October 2020, as a model for establishing references for public communication practices that ensure the effectiveness and creativity of their outcomes. In this way, it can serve as a foundation for designing normative tools that strengthen governance and enforcement of their application, especially in crisis contexts such as the coronavirus pandemic. In addition to conducting a deep comparative analysis of the definitions of communication and politics, it reviews theoretical studies of institutions from political science and institutional change theories, both at the vertical or multilevel level and the horizontal or historical level. In this way, it concludes not only that communication and politics share essential characteristics but also that, by determining the paradigms of social cohesion, communication constitutes the broadest institutional framework of social structure. The findings presented here challenge widespread paradigms such as the concept of political communication, which integrates two elements that are essentially the same and cannot exist as a complementary discipline. They also highlight the concept of media-centric hegemony as a phenomenon that has limited the understanding of the political essence of communication and weakened the epistemological development of the field, affecting its own governance mechanisms—essential conditions for ensuring social cohesion, the core purpose of communication, which guarantees the survival of our democracies.
The research analyzes the development process of the state advertising campaign “El COVID no mata sólo; no seamos cómplices” ("COVID does not only kill; let’s not be accomplices”), aimed at fighting the COVID-19 pandemic in Peru between August and October 2020, as a model for establishing references for public communication practices that ensure the effectiveness and creativity of their outcomes. In this way, it can serve as a foundation for designing normative tools that strengthen governance and enforcement of their application, especially in crisis contexts such as the coronavirus pandemic. In addition to conducting a deep comparative analysis of the definitions of communication and politics, it reviews theoretical studies of institutions from political science and institutional change theories, both at the vertical or multilevel level and the horizontal or historical level. In this way, it concludes not only that communication and politics share essential characteristics but also that, by determining the paradigms of social cohesion, communication constitutes the broadest institutional framework of social structure. The findings presented here challenge widespread paradigms such as the concept of political communication, which integrates two elements that are essentially the same and cannot exist as a complementary discipline. They also highlight the concept of media-centric hegemony as a phenomenon that has limited the understanding of the political essence of communication and weakened the epistemological development of the field, affecting its own governance mechanisms—essential conditions for ensuring social cohesion, the core purpose of communication, which guarantees the survival of our democracies.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Comunicación en salud pública--Perú, Publicidad gubernamental--Perú, Pandemia de COVID-19, 2020- --Perú, Comunicación--Aspectos políticos--Perú
Citación
item.page.endorsement
item.page.review
item.page.supplemented
item.page.referenced
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
