Análisis de la prueba en el procedimiento administrativo sancionador
Date
2025-03-12
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Acceso al texto completo solo para la Comunidad PUCP
Abstract
La problemática que aborda el presente trabajo gira en torno a tres elementos
relacionados con el derecho a la prueba y su vinculación con el procedimiento
administrativo sancionador. En este sentido, se busca desarrollar los aspectos
esenciales de la prueba desde la perspectiva del Derecho Administrativo, dado
que la estructura y finalidad propias de esta rama del derecho determinan que
su aplicación y comprensión sean diferentes. Por ejemplo, aspectos como la
carga de la prueba y la búsqueda de la verdad material presentan diferencias
entre los procedimientos penales o civiles, en comparación con los
procedimientos administrativos.
Por otro lado, el trabajo tiene como objetivo establecer la relación entre el
principio de licitud y el estándar de prueba en el procedimiento administrativo
sancionador, así como identificar el tipo de estándar que debe exigirse en estos
casos. Esta reflexión se fundamenta en la afirmación común de que, en los
procedimientos administrativos, no es necesario aplicar un estándar probatorio
tan riguroso y exigente como en el derecho penal, ya que en dichos
procedimientos no se vulneran derechos de manera tan grave.
Finalmente, el presente trabajo busca analizar la manera correcta de interpretar
la presunción de veracidad de las actas de inspección. Una mala interpretación
de este principio podría llevar a la conclusión errónea de que el acta de
fiscalización funciona bajo el sistema de prueba tasada.
The issue addressed in this paper revolves around three elements related to the right to evidence and its connection with the administrative sanctioning procedure. In this regard, the aim is to develop the essential aspects of evidence from the perspective of Administrative Law, as the structure and purpose specific to this branch of law lead to a different application and understanding. For instance, aspects such as the burden of proof and the pursuit of material truth differ in administrative procedures compared to criminal or civil procedures. On the other hand, this paper seeks to establish the relationship between the principle of lawfulness and the standard of proof in the administrative sanctioning procedure, as well as to identify the type of standard that should be required in these cases. This analysis is based on the common assertion that, in administrative procedures, there is no need to apply such a strict or demanding standard of proof as in criminal law, as these procedures do not involve the same level of rights violations. Finally, this paper aims to analyze the correct interpretation of the presumption of truthfulness of inspection reports. A misinterpretation of this principle could lead to the erroneous conclusion that the inspection report operates under a system of prescribed evidence.
The issue addressed in this paper revolves around three elements related to the right to evidence and its connection with the administrative sanctioning procedure. In this regard, the aim is to develop the essential aspects of evidence from the perspective of Administrative Law, as the structure and purpose specific to this branch of law lead to a different application and understanding. For instance, aspects such as the burden of proof and the pursuit of material truth differ in administrative procedures compared to criminal or civil procedures. On the other hand, this paper seeks to establish the relationship between the principle of lawfulness and the standard of proof in the administrative sanctioning procedure, as well as to identify the type of standard that should be required in these cases. This analysis is based on the common assertion that, in administrative procedures, there is no need to apply such a strict or demanding standard of proof as in criminal law, as these procedures do not involve the same level of rights violations. Finally, this paper aims to analyze the correct interpretation of the presumption of truthfulness of inspection reports. A misinterpretation of this principle could lead to the erroneous conclusion that the inspection report operates under a system of prescribed evidence.
Description
Keywords
Presunciones (Derecho)--Perú, Procedimiento administrativo--Perú, Sanciones administrativas--Perú, Prueba (Derecho)--Perú
Citation
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess