Prescripción adquisitiva entre copropietarios en sede notarial: ¿existe una convalidación por parte del Tribunal Registral?
Fecha
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Acceso al texto completo solo para la Comunidad PUCP
Resumen
El presente trabajo académico analiza la problemática suscitada por la
inscripción registral de procedimientos de prescripción adquisitiva de dominio en
sede notarial cuando estas son solicitadas por copropietarios, pese a la
prohibición expresa del artículo 985° del Código Civil que impide la usucapión
entre condóminos. El presente estudio pretende demostrar que la segunda
instancia registral ha venido convalidando las referidas solicitudes al limitar la
calificación registral solo hacia aspectos formales.
Finalmente, se examinan las resoluciones principales del Tribunal Registral que
evidencian la problemática descrita y los efectos que generan. Por ello, se han
propuesto alternativas para corregir este vacío, debido a que la actual limitación
de la calificación registral genera un riesgo latente para la seguridad jurídica.
This academic paper analyzes the problema arising from the registration of procedures for acquisitive prescription of ownership in a notary's office when these are requested by co-owners, despite the express prohibition in Article 985 of the Civil Code, which prevents adverse possession between co-owners. This study aims to demonstrate that the second instance registry has been validating these requests by limiting the registry's assessment to formal aspects only. Finally, the main resolutions of the Registry Court that highlight the problem described and the effects they generate are examined. Therefore, alternatives have been proposed to correct this gap, since the current limitation of the registry qualification generates a latent risk to legal certainty.
This academic paper analyzes the problema arising from the registration of procedures for acquisitive prescription of ownership in a notary's office when these are requested by co-owners, despite the express prohibition in Article 985 of the Civil Code, which prevents adverse possession between co-owners. This study aims to demonstrate that the second instance registry has been validating these requests by limiting the registry's assessment to formal aspects only. Finally, the main resolutions of the Registry Court that highlight the problem described and the effects they generate are examined. Therefore, alternatives have been proposed to correct this gap, since the current limitation of the registry qualification generates a latent risk to legal certainty.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Prescripción adquisitiva--Perú, Registros públicos--Perú, Derecho civil--Perú
Citación
Colecciones
item.page.endorsement
item.page.review
item.page.supplemented
item.page.referenced
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
