La Regla de Subcapitalización como una “earnings stripping rule”, su aplicación simultánea con otras reglas sobre gastos deducibles y su convivencia con la Norma XVI
Date
2025-03-12
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Acceso al texto completo solo para la Comunidad PUCP
Abstract
En el presente artículo se analiza la regla de subcapitalización bajo la legislación
vigente, mediante la cual se ha ampliado su alcance y se ha cambiado su base
de cálculo. Asimismo, se analiza su aplicación simultánea con otras reglas sobre
gastos deducibles contenidas en la Ley del Impuesto a la Renta,
específicamente, su aplicación en conjunto con la regla sobre gastos
preoperativos. Finalmente, se estudia la convivencia entre la regla de
subcapitalización, como una cláusula antielusiva específica, y la Norma XVI,
como una cláusula antielusiva general.
Se concluye que, bajo la legislación vigente, la regla de subcapitalización en
realidad es una “earnings stripping rule”. Asimismo, se determina que es posible
su aplicación simultánea con la norma que regula la deducción de gastos
preoperativos. Finalmente, se señala que la relación entre la regla de
subcapitalización y la Norma XVI es una relación de supletoriedad, resultando
aplicable esta última en aquellos casos en los que el supuesto no encaja en la
regla de subcapitalización.
This article analyzes the thin capitalization rule under current legislation, through which its scope has been expanded and its calculation base has been changed. Likewise, its simultaneous application with other rules on deductible expenses contained in the Income Tax Law is analyzed, specifically, its application in conjunction with the rule on pre-operating expenses. Finally, the coexistence between the thin capitalization rule, as a specific anti-avoidance clause, and Rule XVI, as a general anti-avoidance clause, is studied. It is concluded that, under current legislation, the thin capitalization rule is actually an "earnings stripping rule". Likewise, it is determined that its simultaneous application with the norm that regulates the deduction of pre-operative expenses is possible. Finally, it is pointed out that the relationship between the thin capitalization rule and Regulation XVI is a relationship of supplementation, the latter being applicable in those cases in which the assumption does not fit the thin capitalization rule.
This article analyzes the thin capitalization rule under current legislation, through which its scope has been expanded and its calculation base has been changed. Likewise, its simultaneous application with other rules on deductible expenses contained in the Income Tax Law is analyzed, specifically, its application in conjunction with the rule on pre-operating expenses. Finally, the coexistence between the thin capitalization rule, as a specific anti-avoidance clause, and Rule XVI, as a general anti-avoidance clause, is studied. It is concluded that, under current legislation, the thin capitalization rule is actually an "earnings stripping rule". Likewise, it is determined that its simultaneous application with the norm that regulates the deduction of pre-operative expenses is possible. Finally, it is pointed out that the relationship between the thin capitalization rule and Regulation XVI is a relationship of supplementation, the latter being applicable in those cases in which the assumption does not fit the thin capitalization rule.
Description
Keywords
Impuesto a la renta--Legislación--Perú, Deducciones de impuestos--Legislación--Perú, Evasión de impuestos--Legislación--Perú, Derecho tributario--Legislación--Perú