La inaplicación del principio de confianza legítima del Indecopi en las resoluciones de productos alimentarios envasado
Date
2024-03-29
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Abstract
Los principios generales del Derecho Administrativo son enunciados normativos
que forman la base para la aplicación e interpretación del Derecho, mediante
estos se dirige el poder de las entidades en miras del respeto por los derechos
de los administrados, En ese sentido, la aplicación de estos principios en el
Derecho es esencial. No obstante, se ha verificado que en diversos
pronunciamientos del Indecopi se estaría inaplicando el Principio de Confianza
Legítima, el mismo que brinda un valor legal a las expectativas objetivas
generadas del administrado, lo cual causaría inseguridad jurídica.
En el presente artículo voy a realizar un análisis sobre el problema mencionado,
estudiando al principio en sí, sus fundamentos e importancia, la normativa
vigente aplicable. Además, voy a analizar algunas resoluciones del Indecopi,
sobre productos alimenticios envasados, en las que desconoce las
competencias de una entidad sectorial competente al no tomar en cuenta los
títulos habilitantes que esta emite causando así, inseguridad jurídica a los
administrados que se ven confundidos al tener dos opiniones distintas de dos
entidades de la Administración Pública.
Finalmente, en la parte final de este artículo se propone una posible solución al
problema identificado, la cual busca definir las competencias de las dos
entidades en base a los objetos jurídicos que cada una protege, poniendo límites
sus actuaciones de acuerdo a dichas competencias.
The principles of Administrative Law are normative statements that form the basis for the application and interpretation of the Law, through which the power of the entities is directed in order to respect the rights of those administered. In that respect, the application of these principles In law it is essential. However, it has been verified that in various Indecopi pronouncements the Principle of Legitimate Trust is not being applied, which provides legal value to the objective expectations generated by the administrator, which would cause legal uncertainty. In this article I am going to analyze the aforementioned problem, studying the principle itself, its foundations and importance, and the current applicable regulations. In addition, I am going to analyze some resolutions of Indecopi, on packaged food products, in which it ignores the powers of a competent sectoral entity by not taking into account the enabling titles that it issues, thus causing legal uncertainty for those administered who are confused when have two different opinions from two entities of the Public Administration. Finally, in the final part of this article a possible solution to the identified problem is proposed, which seeks to define the powers of the two entities based on the legal objects that each one protects, setting limits on their actions according to said powers.
The principles of Administrative Law are normative statements that form the basis for the application and interpretation of the Law, through which the power of the entities is directed in order to respect the rights of those administered. In that respect, the application of these principles In law it is essential. However, it has been verified that in various Indecopi pronouncements the Principle of Legitimate Trust is not being applied, which provides legal value to the objective expectations generated by the administrator, which would cause legal uncertainty. In this article I am going to analyze the aforementioned problem, studying the principle itself, its foundations and importance, and the current applicable regulations. In addition, I am going to analyze some resolutions of Indecopi, on packaged food products, in which it ignores the powers of a competent sectoral entity by not taking into account the enabling titles that it issues, thus causing legal uncertainty for those administered who are confused when have two different opinions from two entities of the Public Administration. Finally, in the final part of this article a possible solution to the identified problem is proposed, which seeks to define the powers of the two entities based on the legal objects that each one protects, setting limits on their actions according to said powers.
Description
Keywords
Instituto Nacional de Defensa de la Competencia y de la Protección de la Propiedad Intelectual (Perú), Derecho administrativo--Perú, Alimentos--Envasado--Perú
Citation
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess