Explorando los límites: El desafío de la ejecución de laudo en sede arbitral y las limitaciones respecto al uso de la fuerza pública
Date
2024-04-01
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Abstract
El presente artículo se centra en el análisis de la ejecución de laudos en sede arbitral,
explorando sus límites y posibilidades. A lo largo de sus páginas, se abordarán las
razones subyacentes a la tendencia común de las partes de no recurrir al ámbito arbitral
para llevar a cabo la ejecución de las decisiones arbitrales, prefiriendo en su lugar
recurrir a la vía judicial. La hipótesis propuesta sugiere una percepción errónea que
asocia la ejecución de una decisión exclusivamente con el uso de la fuerza, cuando, en
realidad, existen escenarios en las que ésta no es necesaria. En ese sentido, se
analizará detenidamente las posibles circunstancias en los cuales no se requiere fuerza
pública para la ejecución y, donde los árbitros pueden desempeñar un papel crucial,
siempre y cuando las partes les haya otorgado dicha facultad. Finalmente, se
reflexionará sobre la viabilidad de autorizar a los árbitros el acceso al uso de la fuerza
pública, subrayando la importancia de preservar la autonomía del arbitraje en la
ejecución de laudos.
This article focuses on a thorough exploration of the enforcement of awards in arbitration proceedings, highlighting both its limitations and opportunities. Throughout its pages, the underlying reasons for the common trend of parties not resorting to arbitration for the execution of arbitral decisions, opting instead to seek enforcement through the judicial system, will be addressed. The proposed hypothesis points to a misconception rooted in the mistaken idea that the enforcement of decisions can only be achieved through the use of force when, in fact, there are situations where this is not necessary. In this context, the scenarios where the intervention of public force is not required for enforcement will be carefully analyzed, and where arbitrators can play a crucial role, provided that the parties have granted them such authority. As a final reflection, there will be an inquiry into the feasibility of authorizing arbitrators to access the use of public force, emphasizing the imperative need to safeguard the autonomy of arbitration in the enforcement of awards.
This article focuses on a thorough exploration of the enforcement of awards in arbitration proceedings, highlighting both its limitations and opportunities. Throughout its pages, the underlying reasons for the common trend of parties not resorting to arbitration for the execution of arbitral decisions, opting instead to seek enforcement through the judicial system, will be addressed. The proposed hypothesis points to a misconception rooted in the mistaken idea that the enforcement of decisions can only be achieved through the use of force when, in fact, there are situations where this is not necessary. In this context, the scenarios where the intervention of public force is not required for enforcement will be carefully analyzed, and where arbitrators can play a crucial role, provided that the parties have granted them such authority. As a final reflection, there will be an inquiry into the feasibility of authorizing arbitrators to access the use of public force, emphasizing the imperative need to safeguard the autonomy of arbitration in the enforcement of awards.
Description
Keywords
Arbitraje y laudo--Legislación--Perú, Arbitros--Perú, Proceso judicial--Legitimidad--Perú
Citation
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess