Search
Now showing items 1-3 of 3
La tutela de los intereses supraindividuales y el dilema de la legitimidad para obrar en el mecanismo procesal de la class action y su posible aplicación en el Perú
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2021-02-25)
de los derechos supraindividuales. En este orden de ideas, los objetivos del presente trabajo son, en primer lugar, determinar si es conveniente o no modificar la regulación actual de los procesos colectivos y, en segundo lugar, si se debe optar por...
El proceso de ejecución peruano y la cosa juzgada
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2022-03-24)
contradicción del proceso de ejecución peruano. Luego de la investigación se concluye que,
si bien debe respetarse el mandato que ordena seguir adelante con la ejecución, lo resuelto
sobre el derecho aparentemente cierto y que será ejecutado no puede gozar de la...
This report analyzes the relationship between execution process and the procedural institution of res judicata. The fundamental objective is to determine whether the decision issued under the execution process may have the authority of res judicata. In this sense, the hypothesis that is formulated is that every time that the execution process is limited in his allegations by the regulation of our Código Procesal Civil and that execution process does not imply full cognition, the enforcement proceedings cannot enjoy the authority of res judicata. To this end, an analysis and investigation of the institution of res judicata of executive guardianship is carried out and, above all, the incident of contradiction of the Peruvian execution process. After the investigation, it is concluded that although the mandate that orders the execution to continue must be respected the decision on the apparently certain right and to be enforced cannot enjoy the quality of res judicata. Otherwise, the legal system would be endorsing the immutability of unjust decisions. This is taking into account the nature of execution process and the contradiction as an incident of summary cognition....
This report analyzes the relationship between execution process and the procedural institution of res judicata. The fundamental objective is to determine whether the decision issued under the execution process may have the authority of res judicata. In this sense, the hypothesis that is formulated is that every time that the execution process is limited in his allegations by the regulation of our Código Procesal Civil and that execution process does not imply full cognition, the enforcement proceedings cannot enjoy the authority of res judicata. To this end, an analysis and investigation of the institution of res judicata of executive guardianship is carried out and, above all, the incident of contradiction of the Peruvian execution process. After the investigation, it is concluded that although the mandate that orders the execution to continue must be respected the decision on the apparently certain right and to be enforced cannot enjoy the quality of res judicata. Otherwise, the legal system would be endorsing the immutability of unjust decisions. This is taking into account the nature of execution process and the contradiction as an incident of summary cognition....
Informe sobre la Casación N° 26707-2017 Lima Sur: análisis de la excepción de cosa juzgada
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2021-08-23)
El presente informe analiza la Sentencia N° 26707-2017 Lima Sur emitida por la Sala de
Derecho Constitucional y Social Permanente de la Corte Suprema dentro de un proceso
de prescripción adquisitiva de dominio. La elección de esta resolución...
This report analyzes the Court Verdict No. 26707-2017-Lima Sur, issued by the Sala de Derecho Constitucional y Social Permanente of the Supreme Court within an adverse possession process. The choice of this judicial resolution is justified because...
This report analyzes the Court Verdict No. 26707-2017-Lima Sur, issued by the Sala de Derecho Constitucional y Social Permanente of the Supreme Court within an adverse possession process. The choice of this judicial resolution is justified because...